Favorite Websites To Learn About Covid-19

coronavirus

Over the past 21 months, so much has been said about Covid-19, from so many different sources and varying opinions, that for me to fully write what I believe about the matter would take a significant amount of time in which I simply rewrite what a few other people have said, except to do it more poorly.

So instead of writing an incredibly long essay which is not needed, nor will be read by many, I will instead make a short statement, but primarily link to some of the best sources I know of for correct Covi-19 information.

There are many exceptional voices of reason. This is not meant to be a comprehensive list. Rather this is a starting point where people who are only familiar with the main stream media's version of events, can start to do more independent research to reach their own conclusions. Blindly accepting anyone's perspective as the absolute truth does no one good. I do not fully agree with everyone I am listing on this page. However, I believe they all have a perspective worth considering, and share a degree of truth.

Many of my clients are very familiar with people on this list. However, for everyone who comes in my office who is familiar with these people, there is still someone else who knows nothing except what they have been told from the TV news.

I am very certain that the actual health threat of Covid-19 has been very much exaggerated. What we have seen over the past 2 years is a culture of fear surrounding coronavirus. It seems that almost any news is presented to fill the audience with as much fear and hysteria as possible. Meanwhile, the monumental cost that people have been asked to pay in this seemingly endless war against coronavirus is mostly ignored.

Dr. Sam Bailey

If there is only one person to listen to, it is her. I know of no one else who so clearly, in a concise way covers so much information so a lay person can understand the actual science behind Covid-19. She is my favorite source on this list, and her opinions on Covid-19 are closest to my own.

Erin Marie Olszewski

Nurse Erin is a genuine hero. During the start of the Covid-19 phenomena she worked in Elmhurst hospital in Queens, NY. This is the hospital which became known for the extremely high death rate and dead bodies piling up in the freezer truck outside. Olszewski shows how it was not simply a virus responsible for all the deaths, but massive incompetence. I'm putting her near the top of this list because we can never get anywhere in understanding what truly happened if the only reaction people have is to say "what about all those deaths!" Yes, many people died. But if our goal is a rationale response focused on moving forward in the best way possible, we can't just respond with fear and panic. We have to ask what really happened.

The Highwire

One of the most popular, and best sources for investigate journalism and interviews around topics of vaccines, Covid-19 and other heath issues.

Children's Health Defense

Robert Kenney's organization. For in depth articles on Covid-19, vaccines and environmental issues.

The Corbett Report

For understanding the greater social, economic and political agenda around Covid-19. What is the real agenda?

The Last American Vagabond

For in depth analysis of news, research studies and more.

Consent Factory

CJ Hopkins esssays and interviews about the psychological elements of Covid-19. Totalitarian measures and what may we do about it?

Academy of Ideas

Videos about philosophy, social psychology, individuality and freedom

Computing Forever

Has a more libertarian slant. I don't agree with everything on this channel, but videos are thought provoking and often cut to the heart of what the Covid-19 phenomena is about.

Must Read Books

The Real Anthony Fauci

Robert Kennedy's exposure of Dr. Fauci. This is not just essential reading for understanding how Covid-19 was mismanaged. It's a deep dive into decades of corruption and harm done by "America's Most Trusted Doctor.:"

Book: The Real Anthony Fauci

Virus Mania

Those who do understand history are doomed to repeated it. Likewise, those who do not understand the science of virology are doom to repeat its mistakes. In depth, yet easy to understand for a lay person, this will tell you what you need to know about virology. Specificity, a history of junk science, false alarms and fear mongering which has been going on for decades.

Dr. Sam Bailey is a coauthor on the latest edition.

Medical Exemptions For Covid-19 Vaccines

Medical Exemptions For Covid-19 Vaccines

Why you almost certainly do not qualify

You can read for yourself the CDC's qualifications for a medical exemption to covid 19 vaccines on this page.

What is particularly notable is slide number 40 of their presentation for heath care workers on who should not get a covid-19 vaccine. Only people who have had a severe anaphylactic reaction to a previous covid-19 vaccine, or components of covid-19 vaccine are exempt. That is it.

I am not arguing that this is medically sound. I do not agree with the CDC at all on this issue. Reasons that do NOT qualify you for an exemption:

  • Autoimmune disease
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Prior infection with Covid-19
  • Allergies
  • Adverse reactions to other vaccines
  • Virtually anything else you can think of

Asking your medical doctor for a vaccine exemption

This totally depends on who you are handing your medical exemption to. If the person reviewing your exemption will simply be impressed with any signed document from a doctor, then you may go this route.

However, if you are seeking an exemption which will be reviewed by a large business, school or government bureaucrats, if they are using the CDC guidelines then your doctor can not help you. Physicians do not have the power to just write out any sort of medical exemption without review. And when it comes to the covid-19 vaccine, there are de facto no valid reasons for a exemption.

Submitting for a Religious Exemption

For religious exemption I suggest looking a one of the two following website. They are both totally independent from each, but each have suggestions for how to abstain a religious excemption:

Universal Church Freedom Peace Justice

My Kids My Choice

Video about CDC’s requirements for vaccine exception:

Covid-19 Articles

Covid-19 Articles

This page will be regularly updated with links to interesting articles on Covid-19. Since this pages is starting in June, it's will not be possible to go back and add to it all the old articles I have read and believe are worth sharing. However, every day there is more information about covid-19 and I would like a place to share articles I find which are worth reading.

Articles are listed in no particular order.

How Fear, Groupthink Drove Unnecessary Global Lockdowns

This is a great article on how politicans are not acting based upon science. Repeatedly faulty models have been used to incite fear. Politicans don't don't respond rationally. They are like a mob who act out of fear.

The collective failure of every Western nation, except one, to question groupthink will surely be studied by economists, doctors, and psychologists for decades to come.

LOCKDOWN LUNACY: the thinking person's guide

Everyone should follow JB Handley. He usually writes about autism. This is about the lack of science behind coronavirus lockdown. 16 facts that most people are not aware of.

Fact #16: All these phased re-openings are utter nonsense with no science to support them, but they will all be declared a success

We could open up again and forget the whole thing

As epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski makes things very clear, governments have not been listening to the science. For 20 years, Wittkowski was the head of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at The Rockefeller University’s Center for Clinical and Translational Science. See what he has to say behind the science of lockdowns.

And it is going on and on and on, just because governments are afraid of admitting an error. They are trying to find excuses. They say they have to do things slowly, and that they have ‘avoided 500,000 deaths’ in the UK. But that was an absurd number that had no justification.

Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says

I don't believe in putting blind faith in official organizations such as the WHO. The contact tracing utopia people such as eluded to in Dr. Kerkhove's talk, could only be done with massive government surveillance and infringement on personal liberties. The cost of setting up such a tracking grid from phone apps and hiring government agents much also be considered. On the whole a cost-benefit analysis would have to be done on why this is a better use of resources, then putting those resources to better use (proper nutrition, sanitation, preventative health care).

Nonetheless, when the WHO says something that flies in the face of what politicians are doing, it's worth taking note of. The lockdown in the United States and other countries, is an unprecedented quarantining of healthy people. This is turning into just one part of politician's attempt to created a whole new culture centered around germaphobia. Yet at the same time the WHO says this is not necessary to protect people against other healthy people.

Last I checked before the covid-19 hysteria, we only considered symptomatic people as potential carriers of cold and flu viruses. This realization should not take advanced degrees and meetings of health "experts" from all around the world to figure out. It's common sense.

All this begs the question: based upon what science are politicians insisting on facemasks, social distancing and other measures to protect us against asymptomatic people?

We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing,” she said. “They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare.

Studies on Covid-19 lethality

Just the raw official data from around the world

The study found that serological antibody tests detect at most 20% of Covid19 infections, as most people neutralize the virus with their mucosal or innate immune system, developing only mild or no symptoms. This means that serological IFR values may drop by a factor of five to values below 0.10%

Decline in infant death during covid-19 crisis

A must read paper on death rates in all ages during 2020. Where things get really interesting is when the numbers show less death in children. This is explained entirely by less death in infants.

the lives of over 200 infants per week were saved duringthemonthofMay.Combiningthenumberoflivessavedin infants and children aged 1‐4, demonstrates a smaller but comparably large and beneficial effect:roughly 145,000 life‐years saved among children under 5.

Are Facemasks Outside Useless?

Are Facemasks Outside Useless?

According to a May 2020 article published in the New England Journal of Medicine there is little justification for wearing fascemasks outside for protection against coronavirus

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.

Facemasks are recommend for specific situations:

  • Being face to face with an infected person

  • Within 6 feet of an infected person

  • The infected person is symptomatic

  • Contact that lasts from 10 to 30 minutes

Therefore masks should be used in certain medical settings. Those caring for, or living with a symptomatic person may also benefit from a mask. But what is the rational for mandating use of fasemask outside? What is driving our media and politicians to promote masks for almost any situations when someone leaves their home? The article does not say what is happening inside the politician's minds. It does however, offer some speculation on why masks have become so popular.

In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

Should masks be used by themselves?

In situations where PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) is needed, a facemask is just one component. Other PPE which should be used includes:

  • Gown
  • Gloves
  • Eye protection

Furthermore, without proper use of the PPE and hand-washing, masks are of little benefit.

The benefit of making all of society wear facemasks?

Governors Cuomo in NY has used his emergency powers to dictate the mandatory use of fascemasks. This does not seem to be a temporary measure. Recent guidelines for how businesses are to operate in NYS give no time frame. Governor Cuomo seems intent on permanently changing society to a state of constant virual paranoia.

Video clearly shows that Governor Cuomo wants this to be a permanent cultural change.

I can find no scientific basis for these politician's obsession with fasemasks. A few months ago such behavior in an individual would have been considered a case of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. As Gerald Celente of Trendsjounal explains, it's the "New Abnormal." Additionally, politicians ignore numerous health problems caused by fasemasks.

Politicians usher in a new "abnormal" based off of fear and no science. they are making the rules up.

Reasons to not wear a facemask

  • Masks trap viral particles, creating possibility for infection.
  • The damp environment of the mask creates opportunely for bacteria to grow, with may cause infection for the use.
  • Impairs breathing. Masks decrease how much oxygen we can breath in. They also increase our levels of carbon dioxide.
  • Only N95 mask, when properly worn may work. Surgical, and especially cloth masks are worthless against coronavirus (see link to my article below). There are currently no regulations on facemasks. Anyone can produce them. They are not made to any standard. Packaging often includes warnings that they are not designed to prevent viral infection.

Go here for Russel Blaylock's article on the dangers of wearing fasemasks

I have also written a blog post a few weeks ago on the dangers of facemasks

World Health Organization does not support social mask wearing

It is not only some naturopathic doctors or people or people who promote alternative health who question social mask wearing. Even the World Health Organization tells people they only need to wear facemasks in specific situations.

World Health Organization does not reccomend masks for outside use
The world health organization does not recommend wearing face masks for going outside.

Pyshcological effects of facemasks

The NEJM states that the real reason for social fasemask use maybe psychological. It can reduce anxiety about becoming infected. The words symbole and talismans are used to describe masks. What is ignored is the negative psychological effects. In specific health settings masks reduce anxiety. Forcing all of society to wear them increases anxiety. Masks are a symbol that anyone you pass on the street is a danger. Anyone may kill you with infection. The mask thus becomes a symbol of perpetual fear.

The long term effect this has on cortisol and stress response is ignored by politicians. Stress and social isolation is associated with disease and shorter life expectancy. Social mask wearing has not been subjected to cost benefit analysis by politicians who enforce their use with no scientific rationale whatsoever.

Facemask recommendations from Dr. Marcus

There are many situations where people are forced by government, private business, or social pressure to wear face masks. I am not telling anyone to disobey the law. This is simply what would be done in a more rationale and ideal world.

  • Masks should only be worn when medically warranted. This includes certain health care situations with high chance of exposure to sick people. Masks may also be useful when taking care of a sick person at home. For this to work, masks must be combined with other measures to stop spread of infection.

  • There is no needed to wear masks in medical situations where there is no significant chance of infection (when around asymptomatic or healthy people).

  • Masks should not be worn outside.

  • No one should do intense or prolonged exercise while wearing a mask.

  • Peer pressure is not a valid reason for wearing a mask. Other people around you may not want to wear a mask as well but do so purely out of social pressure. Taking off your mask, will make others more confident about taking theirs off. (This only goes for situations where there is no medical need to wear a mask).

Additional articles on the pointlessness and danger in wearing masks

Does wearing a mask do any-thing?

Surgical masks lower blood oxygen

The Truth About Amazon Employee Deaths From Covid-19

Verge article on amazon employees dying from coronavirus

The Truth About Amazon Employee Deaths From Covid-19

Personal disclaimer. I do not like Amazon. I believe it is wrong for one company (and one man, Jeff Bezos) to have so much money and power. Amazon also has a long history of treating its employees poorly. Because of these issues and more, I have boycotted Amazon for the past 2 years. Nonetheless, when a news story comes about Amazon and Covid-19 I do not jump to conclusions. I look to the facts.

This post is not really about Amazon. It is about how the media can distort the truth and lie with statistics. Another theme is how bureaucracies waste resources on poorly conceived, counter-productive projects. Finally, it is about the world's response to coronavirus. Amazon is a microcosm of what is going on almost everyplace else.

News reports of death from covid-19 at Amazon

A recent article in Theverge.com reports of an Amazon employee dying from covid-19

Here we can see NBC felt it was newsworthy to report that an eighth Amazon worker had died from covid-19. The implication of NBC selecting this specific death to report on is that something particularly dangerous is happening in the Amazon workplace.

TV news has been reporting on Amazon for months. This is just one example of many news stories.

Facts the Verge and NBC presented about Amazon workers dying from covid-19

  • Eight Amazon workers have officially died from covid-19

  • Three of these workers had been employed in Amazon warehouses. The article does not state where the others were employed.

  • Amazon recently hired an additional 175,000 workers

  • Amazon has not wished to close facilities where workers tested positive. It has been put under pressure to do so.

  • In response to public pressure Amazon will spend $4 billion on coronavirus saftey measures.

Putting the facts into perspective

How much danger are Amazon workers really in? Eight deaths may seen like a lot, but that really depends on how many workers there are. Years ago I was a mail carrier. Another mail carrier in my post office got lung cancer. He Never even smoked or was in poor health. He just suddenly felt sick and a few months later died. About the same time another had to take months off for cancer treatment. Two of fifty mail carriers seemed like a lot. That was 4% of the carriers at that post office. It was one small indication that cancer is a big problem.

Last year it was close to 800,000 people worked for Amazon. If they recently hired another 175,000 that would put their workforce near a million. For the purposes of this article I'll go with the low number and say 800,000.

So 8 out of 800,000 employees caught coronavirus and died. We do not know much about these cases. Their ages, other health conditions and issue with their treatment are not public. Did they die from coronavirus or with it? But, for the sake of argument I will assume that all eight died from covid-19 despite receiving the best medical care.

8 of 800,000 comes down to a 0.001% chance of an Amazon worker dying from covid-19.

Now, lets look at death statistics more broadly. How many workers at Amazon have died from all other causes? The following table is complied with data from Statista.com.

Death rate in United states per 100,000:

I do not have detailed demographic statistics on Amazon employees. Therefore this section will be more of a thought exercise about fear mongering and statistic. For the sake of argument I will make certain assumptions. All of which will be in the direction of erring to a high death rate inside of Amazon.

For the first assumption I will take national death rate for people aged 25 - 29 and apply it to all Amazon workers. Sure, some employees are younger, but many older. This age range is good enough to ensure that I do not overestimate the number of workers who are expected to die of all other causes.

Death rate per 100,000 was 171.3 for males and 68.8 for females. Averaging those two numbers and we get about 120 deaths per 100,000. As an aside, considering how important it is to save every possible life from coronavirus, you would think people would care about the high rate of preventable young male death. I was not aware it was this bad until looking at the numbers to write this post.

120 deaths per 100,000 is based on the national population of 25 - 29 year olds. My second assumption will be that many people are simply to sick to work. Therefore Amazon is not hiring them. So instead of 120 deaths per 100,000 I will go with 60. We thus arrive at the estimate that 60 out of every 100,000 Amazon workers will die this year. This is through no fault of Amazon. The sad fact is that people die. Sometimes people die while still restively young. Therefore any large organization such as Amazon or the United State Postal Service will loose some of their employees each year.

So we can take these numbers and see how many Amazon workers are dying of coronavirus compared to all other causes:

  • 1 death out of 100,000 due to coronavirus

  • 60 deaths out of 100,000 due to all other causes

Another way of looking at it, over 98% of Amazon employee deaths were caused by something else other than covid-19.

The top causes of death in that age group are: accidents, cancer, cardiovascular disease and suicide. This is data taken from before the world of covid-19, but flu and cold deaths caused 1.4% of deaths in age 25 - 44 range. Why don't we have a monumental effort to stop these death like we have for covid-19. Where are the daily death counts on TV news of how many people died by car accident or suicide?

Death from coronavirus is a tragedy. Death from anything else is a statistic.

Yes, every life matters. Every covid-19 death matters. But why does each covid-19 death matter so much more than any other? A full third of deaths in the aged 25 - 44 range are car accidents. Yet we don't tell people not to drive.

Amazon's response to their covid-19 crisis

As a business Amazon is not hurting. Small businesses have been closed due to the lockdown. Many will never reopen. Having a whole country stuck at home with stores closed means online ordering is up. Business is actually booming for Amazon. So when I present the numbers on how much fighting covid-19 is costing Amazon, I'm not trying to get people to feel bad for Jeff Bezos. Regardless of how much we feel about Amazon we should be honest about the facts.

Due to mounting pressure from employees, the media and government Amazon will spend $4 billion from April to June on covid-19 prevention. That is over $4000 per employee. I can only imagine it will be spent on masks, gloves, hand sanitizer, plexiglass, barriers and other devices to keep workers away from each other and squeaky clean.

What will Amazon employees get out of this $4 billion investment in their health?

If employee health is really the issue does any of this make sense? 98% of Amazon employee deaths are from other causes. What if that $4000 per employee was spent on easing stress at the work place? Maybe a plan to give workers better access to healthly food and nutritional supplements. For this kind of money, each employee could have their own team of naturopathic doctor, chiropractor and massage therapist paid for!

Or perhaps money could first be spent on studying what factor are the leading cause of ill health among workers. That way the money could be spent wisely and not based on hysteria.

Instead Amazon is turning its facilities into germaphobia obstacle courses. What science do we have that this will do anything to improve worker safety or reduce death? From what we know about sars-cov-2 it is actually a weak virus. Many people are asymptomatic and don't know they have it. For most who have symptoms it is very mild. Perhaps working to improve the immune system of the most vulnerable, so they do not get sick if exposed to coronavirus is a better option?

The skeptic may say that is speculation. I have no absolute proof that improving the general health and well being of a population will prevent covid-19 deaths. But neither is there any data that the germaphobia obstacle course will save lives either. All this that Amazon and the rest of our country is doing: masks, plexiglass, "social distancing" and more is not proven to work.

The negative effects of fighting coronavirus

Before coronavirus became a problem working conditions at Amazon where already difficult. They are horrible to their employees which is one of the reasons I have been boycotting them for two years. So now Amazon is taking their already stressful working conditions, and adding more stress to it. Face masks impair breathing and may become breading ground for bacteria it not used properly. That is a health risk. What about just the stress of "social distancing" or possible toxic effects of flooding a building with disinfectant?

The germaphobe obstacle course may prevent some infections. But it is like a drug with many nasty side effects. That is why when they do drug studies, there is something called a cost/benefit analysis. Where is the germaphobe obstacle course cost/benefit analysis. No one is doing this. It may be that the treatment is worse than the disease? Increasing workplace stress can be deadly.

Coronavirus and the cost of fear

Waging an all out battle against an enemy no matter what, has a cost. Amazon does not have a cost/benefit analysis for its safety measure. Amazon has done pretty much everything it can do to stop covid-19 within the currant paradigm of lockdown. That still is not enough for its critics. The only thing that will truly satisfy them is to just shut everything down.

Amazon'anti-coronavirus measures need no science. This is about silencing pressure from the outside to do something. The cost/benefit analysis is irrelevant.

Nor does society have a cost/benefit analysis for lockdown. People may get sick because they are unable to see their doctors. I've had this problem with clients not able to come in to see me. Suicide rates are going up. I've already touched on the danger in chronic mask wearing and increased stress. The loss of human touch from a handshake or hug has its cost. These are just a few of many costs we are paying because the government told us we needed to fight coronavirus. When the costs are all added up, is it worth it?

Media hysteria is not harmless.

The way to combat a crisis is not with fear. What we need is rationale, wisdom and compassion. Fear mongering is not benign. Mindless fear-mongering for the sake of trying to grab a headline is unethical. The next time you catch the media hyping up fear around coronavirus or anything else, it's best to step back and think about things first. Yes, each of those Amazon employee deaths does matter. However, the data does not suggest that Amazon employees are dying in extraordinary numbers from coronvirus. They are several times more likely to die of a car accident, cancer or heart disease than coronavirus. As a naturopathic doctor I am committed to health care and especially preventative measures.

While it is good to see Amazon invest $4 billion in employee health, the merits of what they are spending the money on is questionable. What data do we have that Amazon's "Deep Cleaning" is going to amount to anything besides calming down its critics.

At least Amazon can claim it's measures are as "Evidence Based" as the government's.

Kawasakis Disease and Covid-19 Fearmongering

Cat in fear over the coronavirus

Kawasakis Disease and Covid-19 Fearmongering

Cat in fear over the coronavirus

What is Kawasaki Disease

Kawasaki Disease is an inflammatory condition which effects children. Characteristic symptoms include a persistent high fever for five days or more, rash, bloodshot eyes, "strawberry" tongue, cracked and dry lips, redness of fingers and toes.

The specific cause, and pathology of Kawasaki disease is unknown. Studies have looked at numerous possible triggers. These include:

  • Bacterial infections
  • Viral infections
  • Carpet cleaners
  • Proximity to water
  • Trophosporic wind patterns
  • Immunizations

Kawasaki Coronavirus Fear-Mongering Replaces Actual Science

In May 2020, the media which has been fear mongering over covid-19 for several months, jumped on an opportunity to blame coronavirus for causing Kawasaki Disease. As I will review below, this is entirely baseless.

Until now, there have no been reports of covid-19 harming children. You would think that for a disease ravaging through the whole world for months we would have seen some signs of it harming children sooner. So far we have close to zero evidence that children are in danger from covid-19.

That does not stop "news" reports with headlines such as: " A rare, severe inflammatory illness largely believed to be associated with COVID-19 is putting children in ICUs in the United Kingdom and the United States." Evidence is nothing. Speculation is everything. In the age of fear mongering and coronavirus sensationalism, the motto seems to be: fear now, ask questions later.

Having a virus, and symptoms does not mean the virus is the cause of symptoms. Likewise, there is a difference between having sar-cov-2 virus and dying from it. When it comes to covid-19 all rational thinkers have been repeating ad nauseaum "dying with covid-19 is not the same as dying from it."

In a recent report 15 children from ages 2 to 15 in New York City has symptoms consistent with Kawasaki Disease. Of these 15 children how many were diagnosed with covid-19 by PCR? We can turn this into a multiple choice test question:

Number of the 15 children with Kawasaki in NYC who tested positive for covid-19?

  • 15
  • 14
  • 7
  • 4

The answer: 4. That is it. But that is enough for New York City to issue a statement with the headline Pediatric Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome Potentially Associated with COVID-19. Admittingly, serology tests brings the number all the way up to 6.

So we are now to beleive that coronavirus is so dangerous, it can cause severe symptoms in children who are not been exposed to it!

Meanwhile in the UK, where this began the BBC had a headline: "Coronavirus: Children affected by rare Kawasaki-like disease". What the BBC is not telling us, is that cases of Kawasaki Disease are actually down this year in the UK. The UK Kawasaki Disease Foudation states:

Fewer cases of Kawasaki Disease than would be normally expected at this time of year are currently being seen - not more.

The BBC article reads like a bad piece of Orwellian fiction. We can go through blatant lies and distortions:

  • Article says Kawasaki is linked to Coronavirus, which it is not.

  • Says that in April doctors where warned to look for this rare condition. This gives the impression of something new doctors just needed to be educated about. Kawasaki is not a new illness. Pediatricians know about it. There are over 5000 cases of it per year in the United States. Not very common, but not so rare that it's virtually unheard of.

  • BBC then goes on to call this a "new phenomenon" which again, it is not.

  • BBC then quotes a doctor saying that the fact we are seeing this in the middle of Covid-19 means the two are linked. Amazingly, pandemic or not, people will still get sore throats, cavities, ear infections, skin rashes, food poisoning and other conditions including Kawasaki. Other diseases do not go on vaccation because of covid-19.

  • The doctor then repeats that this is something new. Well, it's either Kawasaki Disease, or it is not. The article is trying to claim both. It is a "Kawasaki like" condition, that just happens to be identical to Kawasaki!

  • States that symptoms are " likely to be something related to the build up of antibodies after infection," which is pure speculation. Up to now no single definitive cause for Kawasaki disease has been found.

Just like in New York City, the majority of children did not test positive for covid-19. However, they did test positive for antibodies.

Correlation does not prove causality. In this case, they have not even demonstrated much correlation. But that does not stop the fear mongering-hype which undoubtedly will cause many children around the world to remain locked up indoors and smothered with face masks.

The possibility that children tested positive for covid-19 simply because it is a virus circulating around the world, and had nothing to do with Kawasaki is not mentioned in the article.

Kawasaki and Vaccines?

ROTARIX vaccine for rotavirus has been associated with Kawasaki disease. This can be read in the vaccine package insert.

There are numerous studies which have looked at rotovirus and Kawasaki connection. Officially, there is no clear conclusion. What would be interesting is detailed information on all children with Kawasaki, and relationship to vaccines. This would include both recent vaccines, and total. Regardless, there are unvaccinated children who may also get Kawasaki. So even if a vaccine(s) was found to be a cause, it is not the trigger in everyone.

List of additional Rotovirus and vaccine studies

Putting Kawasaki disease and coronavirus in perspective

In depth articles on the non-connection between Kawasaki and Covid-19

The UK Kawawaki disease foundation have an good review on how there is no evidence of connection to covid-19.

Childrens Health Defense reviews history of Kawasaki and research into other possible causes including vaccines and mercury.